Name: Employment Screening and Non-Conviction Information: A Human Rights Perspective (en Inglés)
Price: 71.40 USD
Availability: InStock
Author: Thomas, Terry ; Bennett, Kevin
ISBN: 9783030287108

portada Employment Screening and Non-Conviction Information: A Human Rights Perspective (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Kevin Bennett

Terry Thomas

Editorial

Palgrave Pivot

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

169

Encuadernación

Tapa Dura

Dimensiones

21.0 x 14.8 x 1.3 cm

Peso

0.37 kg.

ISBN13

9783030287108

Categorías

Penología
Recursos humanos

Employment Screening and Non-Conviction Information: A Human Rights Perspective (en Inglés)

Kevin Bennett (Autor) · Terry Thomas (Autor) · Palgrave Pivot · Tapa Dura

Libro Nuevo

$ 71.40

$ 142.80

Ahorras: $ 71.40

50% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Viernes 02 de Agosto y el Viernes 16 de Agosto.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Ecuador entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Employment Screening and Non-Conviction Information: A Human Rights Perspective (en Inglés)"

This book provides a critical overview of the policy frameworks underpinning the contemporary practices of non-conviction information disclosure during pre-employment 'screening'. It questions how a man can walk free from a criminal court as an innocent person only to have all the court details of his acquittal passed to any potential employer.Despite several million 'enhanced' criminal background checks being performed each year, there has been little discussion of these issues within academic literature. Non-conviction information, also known as 'police intelligence', is a less well-known check provided alongside the criminal record check. This book seeks to define what is meant by non-conviction information and to provide a clear and simple explanation of how this decision making process of police disclosure to employers is made. It also considers the extent to which these practices have been subjected to legal challenges within the UK and explores how public protection is balanced against individual rights.