Compartir
Hate: Why we Should Resist it With Free Speech, not Censorship (Inalienable Rights) (en Inglés)
Nadine Strossen
(Autor)
·
Oxford University Press, USA
· Tapa Blanda
Hate: Why we Should Resist it With Free Speech, not Censorship (Inalienable Rights) (en Inglés) - Strossen, Nadine
$ 29.48
$ 45.36
Ahorras: $ 15.87
Elige la lista en la que quieres agregar tu producto o crea una nueva lista
✓ Producto agregado correctamente a la lista de deseos.
Ir a Mis Listas
Origen: Estados Unidos
(Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)
Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el
Miércoles 05 de Junio y el
Miércoles 19 de Junio.
Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Ecuador entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.
Reseña del libro "Hate: Why we Should Resist it With Free Speech, not Censorship (Inalienable Rights) (en Inglés)"
The updated paperback edition of HATE dispels misunderstandings plaguing our perennial debates about "hate speech vs. free speech," showing that the First Amendment approach promotes free speech and democracy, equality, and societal harmony. As "hate speech" has no generally accepted definition, we hear many incorrect assumptions that it is either absolutely unprotected or absolutely protected from censorship. Rather, U.S. law allows government to punish hateful or discriminatory speech in specific contexts when it directly causes imminent serious harm. Yet, government may not punish such speech solely because its message is disfavored, disturbing, or vaguely feared to possibly contribute to some future harm. "Hate speech" censorship proponents stress the potential harms such speech might further: discrimination, violence, and psychic injuries. However, there has been little analysis of whether censorship effectively counters the feared injuries. Citing evidence from manycountries, this book shows that "hate speech" are at best ineffective and at worst counterproductive. Therefore, prominent social justice advocates worldwide maintain that the best way to resist hate and promote equality is not censorship, but rather, vigorous "counterspeech" and activism.