Name: Pluviculture and Meteorological Mumpsimuses: How to Avert an $11 Trillion Climate Change "Investment" (en Inglés)
Price: 41.50 USD
Availability: InStock
Author: Sharp, Arthur
ISBN: 9781728329949

portada Pluviculture and Meteorological Mumpsimuses: How to Avert an $11 Trillion Climate Change "Investment" (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Arthur Sharp

Editorial

Authorhouse

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

314

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

22.9 x 15.2 x 1.8 cm

Peso

0.46 kg.

ISBN13

9781728329949

Categorías

Política y gobierno
Economía

Pluviculture and Meteorological Mumpsimuses: How to Avert an $11 Trillion Climate Change "Investment" (en Inglés)

Arthur Sharp (Autor) · Authorhouse · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo

$ 41.50

$ 63.84

Ahorras: $ 22.35

35% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Lunes 29 de Julio y el Lunes 12 de Agosto.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Ecuador entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Pluviculture and Meteorological Mumpsimuses: How to Avert an $11 Trillion Climate Change "Investment" (en Inglés)"

This unique book traces the history of climate change through published accounts dating back hundreds of years. It's like readers have subscriptions to old newspapers and are reading their predecessors' concerns firsthand. The author traces the thoughts and actions of "climate changers" from the Roman and Greek eras and presents eleven inane, outrageously costly schemes that they have proposed over the years, e.g., placing an umbrella over the Sphinx, diverting the Gulf Stream to warm the climate of Eastern Canada, or heating Chicago with underground pipes. He warns that taxpayers can expect more of the same types of costly and unnecessary schemes from contemporary climate changers in the near future. Ultimately, readers are left to decide for themselves if climate change is the most serious challenge of our generation that politicians and scientists claim it is. (Spoiler alert: it isn't.) Simply put, history trumps science in the climate change debate.