Name: Commercial Speech and the First Amendment (en Inglés)
SKU: 62260252
Price: 46.82 USD
Availability: InStock
Author: Landmark Publications

portada Commercial Speech and the First Amendment (en Inglés)

Commercial Speech and the First Amendment (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Independently Published

Autor

Landmark Publications

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

542

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

ISBN13

9781073557240

Commercial Speech and the First Amendment (en Inglés)

Landmark Publications (Autor) · Independently Published · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 20 a 27 días háb.

$ 93.64$ 46.82

-50%

Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo

Quedan más de 100 unidades

$ 46.82

Llega entre el 18 Sep y el 01 Oct a Quito, Pichincha. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "Commercial Speech and the First Amendment (en Inglés)"

THIS CASEBOOK contains a selection of U. S. Court of Appeals decisions that analyze, interpret and discuss First Amendment commercial speech doctrine. * * * "The States and the Federal Government are free to prevent the dissemination of commercial speech that is false, deceptive, or misleading, or that proposes an illegal transaction. Commercial speech that is not false or deceptive and does not concern unlawful activities, however, may be restricted only in the service of a substantial governmental interest, and only through means that directly advance that interest." Id. at 638, 105 S.Ct. 2265 (citing Central Hudson, 447 U.S. at 566, 100 S.Ct. 2343) (other internal citations omitted).The regulation of commercial speech is subject to different levels of review, depending on the nature of the law. In Central Hudson, the Court established that a restriction on commercial speech is subject to intermediate scrutiny, that is, a determination of whether the restriction directly advances a substantial governmental interest and is not overly restrictive. 447 U.S. at 564, 100 S.Ct. 2343. In Zauderer, however, the Court created an exception that an informational disclosure law- as opposed to a prohibition on speech- was subject to rational review, that is, a determination of whether the required disclosure is reasonably related to the state's interest. 471 U.S. at 651, 105 S.Ct. 2265. Safelite Group, Inc. v. Jepsen, 764 F. 3d 258 (2nd Cir. 2014).