Name: Focus on Form vs. Focus on Meaning in Reading Class (en Inglés)
SKU: 62583713
Price: 81.41 USD
Availability: InStock
Author: Leila Pooshaneh

portada Focus on Form vs. Focus on Meaning in Reading Class (en Inglés)

Focus on Form vs. Focus on Meaning in Reading Class (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Lap Lambert Academic Publishing

Autor

Leila Pooshaneh

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

140

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

ISBN13

9783659720802

Focus on Form vs. Focus on Meaning in Reading Class (en Inglés)

Leila Pooshaneh (Autor) · Lap Lambert Academic Publishing · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 25 a 32 días háb.

$ 148.02$ 81.41

-45%

Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo

Quedan 10 unidades

$ 81.41

Llega entre el 28 Sep y el 12 Oct a Quito, Pichincha. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "Focus on Form vs. Focus on Meaning in Reading Class (en Inglés)"

Many empirical investigations have demonstrated that explicit Focus on Form(FOF)methods are more effective than implicit Focus on Meaning(FOM)methods, because in FOF instruction learners' attention is drawn to linguistic form while FOM instruction requires learners'attention to communicate. However, this piece of research focused on both the effectiveness and feasibility study of FOFvs.FOM in reading class.In this quasi-experimental study,20 adult EFL learners of pre-intermediate level were divided into two experimental groups which received two different types of instruction.During a ten-session treatment, the first group was provided with FOFinstruction, while the second group was provided with FOM instruction.The results revealed a significant difference between two experimental groups.The FOF group scored significantly higher than the FOM group.Regarding the students and teachers' perspectives towards feasibility of FOF in reading class, the students believed that FOF was feasible in reading classes, while the teachers were not unanimous in this regard, but towards feasibility of FOM both groups held positive attitudes.So, both FOF and FOM have feasibility in reading