Name: Judicial Merit Selection: Institutional Design and Performance for State Courts (en Inglés)
SKU: 51490029
Price: 49.60 USD
Availability: InStock
Author: Greg Goelzhauser

portada Judicial Merit Selection: Institutional Design and Performance for State Courts (en Inglés)

Judicial Merit Selection: Institutional Design and Performance for State Courts (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Temple University Press

Autor

Greg Goelzhauser

Año

2019

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

222

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

ISBN13

9781439918081

N° edición

Categorías

Derecho local
Derecho autonómico o regional

Judicial Merit Selection: Institutional Design and Performance for State Courts (en Inglés)

Greg Goelzhauser (Autor) · Temple University Press · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 26 a 33 días háb.

$ 90.18$ 49.60

-45%

Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo

Quedan 3 unidades

$ 49.60

Llega entre el 29 Sep y el 13 Oct a Quito, Pichincha. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "Judicial Merit Selection: Institutional Design and Performance for State Courts (en Inglés)"

The judicial selection debate continues. Merit selection is used by a majority of states but remains the least well understood method for choosing judges. Proponents claim that it emphasizes qualifications and diversity over politics, but there is little empirical evidence regarding its performance. In Judicial Merit Selection, Greg Goelzhauser amasses a wealth of data to examine merit selection’s institutional performance from an internal perspective. While his previous book, Choosing State Supreme Court Justices, compares outcomes across selection mechanisms, here he delves into what makes merit selection unique—its use of nominating commissions to winnow applicants prior to gubernatorial appointment. Goelzhauser’s analyses include a rich case study from inside a nominating commission’s proceedings as it works to choose nominees; the use of public records to examine which applicants commissions choose and which nominees governors choose; evaluation of which attorneys apply for consideration and which judges apply for promotion; and examination of whether design differences across systems impact performance in the seating of qualified and diverse judges.The results have critical public policy implications.