Name: Live Fire Testing: Evaluating Dod's Programs: Pemd-87-17 (en Inglés)
SKU: 59699286
Price: 34.63 USD
Availability: InStock
Author: U. S. Government Accountability Office ( ; U. S. Government Accountability Office (

portada Live Fire Testing: Evaluating Dod's Programs: Pemd-87-17 (en Inglés)

Live Fire Testing: Evaluating Dod's Programs: Pemd-87-17 (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Bibliogov

Autor

U. S. Government Accountability Office ( ; U. S. Government Accountability Office (

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

170

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

24.6x18.9x0.9 cm

Peso

0.31 kg.

ISBN13

9781287260530

Categorías

Política y gobierno

Live Fire Testing: Evaluating Dod's Programs: Pemd-87-17 (en Inglés)

U. S. Government Accountability Office ( ; U. S. Government Accountability Office ( (Autor) · Bibliogov · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 21 a 28 días háb.

$ 69.26$ 34.63

-50%

Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo

Quedan 100 unidades

$ 34.63

Llega entre el 21 Sep y el 02 Oct a Quito, Pichincha. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "Live Fire Testing: Evaluating Dod's Programs: Pemd-87-17 (en Inglés)"

In response to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Department of Defense (DOD) Joint Live Fire (JLF) Test Program to determine: (1) the status of each munition and system scheduled for testing; (2) the methodological quality of the test and evaluation process; (3) the advantages and limitations of full-up, live-fire testing; and (4) needed improvements. GAO found that: (1) the JLF tests for armor were two years behind schedule due to a controversy over objectives and methodology; (2) although the aircraft testing program has suffered less severe delays, a lack of targets is a problem for both components; (3) DOD has made little progress in validating its vulnerability/lethality (V/L) assessment program estimates; (4) full-up, live-fire testing is the only V/L assessment method that provides direct visual observation of weapon damage to a target under realistic conditions; (5) high cost and the limited target availability are the main limitations to testing; and (6) other test methods could supplement full-up, full-scale testing, but not substitute for it. GAO identified possible improvements in the design, conduct, and interpretation of live-fire testing.