Name: Mapping the Differentiated Consensus of the Joint Declaration (en Inglés)
SKU: 63560685
Price: 52.03 USD
Availability: InStock
Author: Jakob Karl Rinderknecht

portada Mapping the Differentiated Consensus of the Joint Declaration (en Inglés)

Mapping the Differentiated Consensus of the Joint Declaration (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Springer Nature B.V.

Autor

Jakob Karl Rinderknecht

Año

2016

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

292

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

21x14.8 cm

ISBN13

9783319401003

Mapping the Differentiated Consensus of the Joint Declaration (en Inglés)

Jakob Karl Rinderknecht (Autor) · Springer Nature B.V. · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 16 a 22 días háb.

$ 104.06$ 52.03

-50%

Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo

Quedan 50 unidades

$ 52.03

Llega entre el 17 Sep y el 29 Sep a Quito, Pichincha. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "Mapping the Differentiated Consensus of the Joint Declaration (en Inglés)"

This book uses the insights of cognitive linguistics to argue for the possibility of differentiated consensus between separated churches. The Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification, signed by the Lutheran World Federation and the Roman Catholic Church in 1999, represents the high water mark of the twentieth-century ecumenical movement. It declares that the sixteenth-century condemnations related to justification do not condemn the teachings of the partner church. Some critics reject the agreement, arguing that a consensus that is differentiated is not actually a consensus.

In this book, Jakob Karl Rinderknecht shows that mapping the "cognitive blends" that structure meaning can reveal underlying agreement within apparent theological contradictions. He traces Lutheran and Catholic positions on sin in the baptized, especially the Lutheran simul iustus et peccator and the Catholic insistence that concupiscence in the baptized is not sin. He demonstrates that the JDDJ reconciles these positions, and therefore that a truly differentiated consensus is possible.