Name: Structured to Fail? Regulatory Performance Under Competing Mandates (en Inglés)
Price: 64.27 USD
Availability: InStock
Author: Christopher Carrigan
ISBN: 9781316632802

portada Structured to Fail? Regulatory Performance Under Competing Mandates (en Inglés)

Structured to Fail? Regulatory Performance Under Competing Mandates (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Cambridge University Press

Autor

Christopher Carrigan

Año

2017

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

336

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

ISBN13

9781316632802

Categorías

Administración pública

Structured to Fail? Regulatory Performance Under Competing Mandates (en Inglés)

Christopher Carrigan (Autor) · Cambridge University Press · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 16 a 22 días háb.

$ 116.85$ 64.27

-45%

Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo

Quedan 50 unidades

$ 64.27

Llega entre el 26 Ago y el 07 Sep a Quito, Pichincha. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "Structured to Fail? Regulatory Performance Under Competing Mandates (en Inglés)"

In the search for explanations for three of the most pressing crises of the early twenty-first century (the housing meltdown and financial crisis, the Gulf oil spill, and the nuclear disaster at Fukushima), commentators pointed to the structure of the regulatory agencies charged with overseeing the associated industries, noting that the need to balance competing regulatory and non-regulatory missions undermined each agency's ability to be an effective regulator. Christopher Carrigan challenges this critique by employing a diverse set of research methods, including a statistical analysis, an in-depth case study of US regulatory oversight of offshore oil and gas development leading up to the Gulf oil spill, and a formal theoretical discussion, to systematically evaluate the benefits and concerns associated with either combining or separating regulatory and non-regulatory missions. His analysis demonstrates for policymakers and scholars why assigning competing non-regulatory missions to regulatory agencies can still be better than separating them in some cases.