Name: The Case for Eyewitness Identification Reform (en Inglés)
SKU: 63290171
Price: 75.39 USD
Availability: InStock
Author: William Collins
ISBN: 9781639055203

portada The Case for Eyewitness Identification Reform (en Inglés)

The Case for Eyewitness Identification Reform (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

American Bar Association

Autor

William Collins

Idioma

Inglés

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

ISBN13

9781639055203

The Case for Eyewitness Identification Reform (en Inglés)

William Collins (Autor) · American Bar Association · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 17 a 24 días háb.

$ 137.08$ 75.39

-45%

Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo

Quedan 45 unidades

$ 75.39

Llega entre el 21 Oct y el 05 Nov a Quito, Pichincha. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "The Case for Eyewitness Identification Reform (en Inglés)"

The Case for Eyewitness Identification Reform is divided into five chapters.Chapter 1 lays out the existing eyewitness identification practice in most jurisdictions.Chapter 2 sets forth the law governing eyewitness identification admissibility, as embodied primarily by Manson v. Brathwaite, and how juries are instructed regarding eyewitness identification evidence that is admitted at trial, as embodied primarily by Telfaire v. United States.Chapter 3 lays out what we currently know about memory and perception, insofar as they relate to eyewitness identification.Chapter 4 examines criticisms of Manson and Telfaire, in light of what we know about perception and memory, and outlines past attempts at reforming this body of doctrine to achieve strong deterrence and reduce the number of wrongful convictions.Chapter 5 sets forth the system and estimator variables and makes the case for three-pronged approach to reform outlined above: i.e., barring identification evidence that is either (1) obtained by suggestive means taking into account all system variables or (2) whose probative value does not substantially outweigh its prejudice when taking into account both system and estimator variables, and further (3) instructing juries to consider both system and estimator variables, insofar as they are implicated by the evidence.