Name: The Rooker-Feldman Doctrine (en Inglés)
SKU: 62792315
Price: 51.53 USD
Availability: InStock
Author: Landmark Publications

portada The Rooker-Feldman Doctrine (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Independently Published

Autor

Landmark Publications

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

552

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

ISBN13

9781094658414

The Rooker-Feldman Doctrine (en Inglés)

Landmark Publications (Autor) · Independently Published · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 20 a 27 días háb.

$ 93.70$ 51.53

-45%

Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo

Quedan 100 unidades

$ 51.53

Llega entre el 28 Sep y el 12 Oct a Quito, Pichincha. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "The Rooker-Feldman Doctrine (en Inglés)"

THIS CASEBOOK contains a selection of U. S. Court of Appeals decisions that analyze, interpret and apply the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. * * * Rooker-Feldman's jurisdictional bar protects the Supreme Court's certiorari jurisdiction under Section 1257 of Title 28 of the United States Code. It ensures that the United States Supreme Court is the only federal court to hear appeals from judgments rendered by the highest court of a state (or, as here, the District of Columbia). See D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 476, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983); Rooker v. Fidelity Tr. Co., 263 U.S. 413, 44 S.Ct. 149, 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923); see also Gray v. Poole, 275 F.3d 1113, 1119 (D.C. Cir. 2002). Operationally, the Rooker-Feldman doctrine "is confined to cases of the kind from which the doctrine acquired its name: cases brought by [i] state-court losers [ii] complaining of injuries caused by state-court judgments rendered before the [federal] district court proceedings commenced and [iii] inviting district court review and rejection of those judgments." Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Indus., 544 U.S. 280, 284, 125 S.Ct. 1517, 161 L.Ed.2d 454 (2005). The Supreme Court has repeatedly emphasized that the doctrine is "narrow," applicable to bar only complaints that meet those listed conditions. Id.; see Skinner v. Switzer, 562 U.S. 521, 531, 131 S.Ct. 1289, 179 L.Ed.2d 233 (2011); Lance v. Dennis, 546 U.S. 459, 464, 126 S.Ct. 1198, 163 L.Ed.2d 1059 (2006); see also Singletary v. D.C., 766 F.3d 66, 71 (D.C. Cir. 2014). Indeed, the only two cases in which the Supreme Court has ever applied the doctrine to dismiss an action are the Rooker and Feldman namesake cases themselves. See Exxon Mobil Corp., 544 U.S. at 283, 125 S.Ct. 1517. Croley v. Joint Committee on Judicial Admin., 895 F. 3d 22 (DC Cir. 2018)