Name: The unconstitutionality of objectifying concrete or diffuse control (en Inglés)
Price: 67.82 USD
Availability: InStock
Author: Gomes, Anderson Ricardo
ISBN: 9786207233373

portada The unconstitutionality of objectifying concrete or diffuse control (en Inglés)

The unconstitutionality of objectifying concrete or diffuse control (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Anderson Ricardo Gomes

Editorial

Our Knowledge Publishing

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

100

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

22.9 x 15.2 x 0.6 cm

Peso

0.16 kg.

ISBN13

9786207233373

Categorías

Contratos del sector público
Derecho público

The unconstitutionality of objectifying concrete or diffuse control (en Inglés)

Anderson Ricardo Gomes (Autor) · Our Knowledge Publishing · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 25 a 32 días háb.

$ 123.31$ 67.82

-45%

Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo

Quedan 10 unidades

$ 67.82

Llega entre el 25 Ago y el 07 Sep a Quito, Pichincha. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "The unconstitutionality of objectifying concrete or diffuse control (en Inglés)"

The Brazilian model of constitutionality control is based on mixed jurisdictional control, with different rules governing the subjective extent of its declaratory decisions of unconstitutionality, since in abstract or concentrated control its decision alone will have binding and erga omnes effectiveness. In concrete or diffuse control, as the main issue is whether or not a certain subjective right of the party exists, the declaration of unconstitutionality of the normative act will not apply to anyone other than the partial subjects of the process, unless under the terms of art. 52, X, of the Federal Constitution, the Federal Senate orders the suspension of the execution of the law declared unconstitutional. The theory of the abstraction or objectification of the concrete or diffuse control of constitutionality proposes that the effects of the decision of unconstitutionality handed down in the concrete or diffuse control by the STF should be equal to those of the decision handed down in the abstract control, based on a different interpretation of item X of article 52 of the Constitution, resulting from a constitutional change. However, in view of the current legal-constitutional order, such equalisation of effects is invalid.