Name: Breaking the Bathsheba Syndrome: Building a Performance Evaluation System That Promotes Mission Command (en Inglés)
SKU: 52927403
Price: 39.79 USD
Availability: InStock
Author: Curtis D. Taylor; Strategic Studies Institute; U.S. Army War College

portada Breaking the Bathsheba Syndrome: Building a Performance Evaluation System That Promotes Mission Command (en Inglés)

Breaking the Bathsheba Syndrome: Building a Performance Evaluation System That Promotes Mission Command (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Lulu.Com

Autor

Curtis D. Taylor; Strategic Studies Institute; U.S. Army War College

Año

2015

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

ISBN13

9781329784512

Categorías

Enciclopedias y obras de consulta

Breaking the Bathsheba Syndrome: Building a Performance Evaluation System That Promotes Mission Command (en Inglés)

Curtis D. Taylor; Strategic Studies Institute; U.s. Army War College (Autor) · Lulu.Com · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 25 a 32 días háb.

$ 79.59$ 39.79

-50%

Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo

Quedan 10 unidades

$ 39.79

Llega entre el 01 Oct y el 15 Oct a Quito, Pichincha. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "Breaking the Bathsheba Syndrome: Building a Performance Evaluation System That Promotes Mission Command (en Inglés)"

Survey after survey across the U.S. Army continue to reveal broad concern about the Army's top-down performance evaluation system. Many claim that it drives behavior in organizations that not only inhibits the exercise of mission command, but also rewards image management over organizational leadership. Colonel Curtis Taylor takes a hard look at this system, its benefits and its cultural incentives. More importantly, he asks if the current system promotes or impedes the exercise of mission command. After examining the history of the Army's performance evaluation system and alternative models outside the military, Colonel Taylor concludes that a more holistic system that combines top-down evaluations, peer and subordinate evaluation, and objective testing might be a better approach.