Name: Fairness in Criminal Appeal: A Critical and Interdisciplinary Analysis of the Ecthr Case-Law (en Inglés)
Price: 105.50 USD
Availability: InStock
Author: Morão, Helena ; Tavares Da Silva, Ricardo
ISBN: 9783031130038

portada Fairness in Criminal Appeal: A Critical and Interdisciplinary Analysis of the Ecthr Case-Law (en Inglés)

Fairness in Criminal Appeal: A Critical and Interdisciplinary Analysis of the Ecthr Case-Law (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Springer

Autor

Morão, Helena ; Tavares Da Silva, Ricardo

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

213

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

23.4 x 15.6 x 1.2 cm

Peso

0.33 kg.

ISBN13

9783031130038

N° edición

Categorías

Derecho internacional
Derecho: derechos humanos y libertades civiles
Derecho y procedimiento penal

Fairness in Criminal Appeal: A Critical and Interdisciplinary Analysis of the Ecthr Case-Law (en Inglés)

Morão, Helena ; Tavares Da Silva, Ricardo (Autor) · Springer · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 16 a 23 días háb.

$ 175.84$ 105.50

-40%

Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo

Quedan más de 100 unidades

$ 105.50

Llega entre el 20 Jul y el 31 Jul a Quito, Pichincha. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "Fairness in Criminal Appeal: A Critical and Interdisciplinary Analysis of the Ecthr Case-Law (en Inglés)"

This book addresses the European Court of Human Rights' fairness standards in criminal appeal, filling a gap in this less researched area of studies. Based on a fair trial immediacy requirement, the Court has found several violations of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights at the appellate level by at least eighteen States of the Council of Europe in a vast array of cases, particularly in contexts of first instance acquittals overturning and of sentences increasing on appeal. On the one hand, the book critically engages this case-law with the law revisions it has recently inspired in European countries, as well as with the critiques and difficulties that it continues to raise. On the other hand, it interweaves insight from criminal procedure theory with new discoveries in the field of cognitive sciences (neuroscience of memory, philosophy of knowledge, AI), shedding an interdisciplinary light on the (in)adequacy and limits of the Strasbourg Court's jurisprudence.