Name: Structure and Being: A Theoretical Framework for a Systematic Philosophy (en Inglés)
SKU: 19500274
Price: 62.74 USD
Availability: InStock
Author: Lorenz B. Puntel

portada Structure and Being: A Theoretical Framework for a Systematic Philosophy (en Inglés)

Structure and Being: A Theoretical Framework for a Systematic Philosophy (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Penn State University Press

Autor

Lorenz B. Puntel

Año

2013

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

528

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

ISBN

0271033746

ISBN13

9780271033747

N° edición

Categorías

Filosofía: epistemología y teoría del conocimiento

Structure and Being: A Theoretical Framework for a Systematic Philosophy (en Inglés)

Lorenz B. Puntel (Autor) · Penn State University Press · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 18 a 25 días háb.

$ 125.49$ 62.74

-50%

Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo

Quedan 10 unidades

$ 62.74

Llega entre el 17 Sep y el 30 Sep a Quito, Pichincha. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "Structure and Being: A Theoretical Framework for a Systematic Philosophy (en Inglés)"

A magisterial work in the grand tradition of systematic philosophy not seen in this country perhaps since Alfred North Whitehead’s Process and Reality (1929), this book by a leading German philosopher aims to resurrect systematic philosophy as an essential part of the theoretical enterprise. In Lorenz Puntel’s vision, philosophy as the universal science can be holistic without being imperialistic.The book presents theoretical frameworks as indispensable for any and all theorizing. It argues that there can be truths only relative to sufficiently determinable theoretical frameworks, and that all such frameworks are genuinely revelatory ontologically. No problematic relativism results, however, because such frameworks can be compared and thereby ranked with respect to their theoretical adequacy.Structure and Being contributes to the reconciliation of analytic and continental philosophy by insisting upon clarity and precision, as the former does, while aiming for comprehensiveness, as the latter often does.