Name: The Myth of Judicial Independence (en Inglés)
Price: 197.43 USD
Availability: InStock
Author: Mike Mcconville; Luke Marsh
ISBN: 9780198822103

portada The Myth of Judicial Independence (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Oup Oxford

Autor

Mike Mcconville; Luke Marsh

Año

2020

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

336

Encuadernación

Tapa Dura

ISBN13

9780198822103

Categorías

Proceso civil del ordenamiento jurídico

The Myth of Judicial Independence (en Inglés)

Mike Mcconville; Luke Marsh (Autor) · Oup Oxford · Tapa Dura

Libro Físico

$ 197.43

$ 303.73

Ahorras: $ 106.31

35% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Viernes 19 de Julio y el Martes 30 de Julio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Ecuador entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "The Myth of Judicial Independence (en Inglés)"

Through an examination of the history of the rules that regulate police interrogation (the Judges' Rules) in conjunction with plea bargaining and the Criminal Procedure Rules, this book explores the 'Westminster Model' under which three arms of the State (parliament, the executive, and the judiciary) operate independently of one another. It reveals how policy was framed in secret meetings with the executive which then actively misled parliament in contradiction to its ostensible formal relationship with the legislature. This analysis of Home Office archives shows how the worldwide significance of the Judges' Rules was secured not simply by the standing of the English judiciary and the political power of the empire but more significantly by the false representation that the Rules were the handiwork of judges rather than civil servants and politicians. The book critically examines the claim repeatedly advanced by judges that "judicial independence" is justified by principles arising from the "rule of law" and instead shows that the "rule of law" depends upon basic principles of the common law, including an adversarial process and trial by jury, and that the underpinnings of judicial action in criminal justice today may be ideological rather than based on principles.