Name: Fairness in Criminal Appeal: A Critical and Interdisciplinary Analysis of the Ecthr Case-Law (en Inglés)
Price: 155.84 USD
Availability: InStock
Author: Morão, Helena ; Tavares Da Silva, Ricardo
ISBN: 9783031130007

portada Fairness in Criminal Appeal: A Critical and Interdisciplinary Analysis of the Ecthr Case-Law (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Ilustrado por

Helena Morão

Ricardo Tavares Da Silva

Editorial

Springer

Autor

Morão, Helena ; Tavares Da Silva, Ricardo

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

213

Encuadernación

Tapa Dura

Dimensiones

23.4 x 15.6 x 1.4 cm

Peso

0.50 kg.

ISBN13

9783031130007

Categorías

Derecho internacional
Derecho procesal penal

Fairness in Criminal Appeal: A Critical and Interdisciplinary Analysis of the Ecthr Case-Law (en Inglés)

Helena Morão (Ilustrado por) · Ricardo Tavares Da Silva (Ilustrado por) · Springer · Tapa Dura

Libro Nuevo

$ 155.84

$ 311.69

Ahorras: $ 155.84

50% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Lunes 22 de Julio y el Lunes 05 de Agosto.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Ecuador entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Fairness in Criminal Appeal: A Critical and Interdisciplinary Analysis of the Ecthr Case-Law (en Inglés)"

This book addresses the European Court of Human Rights' fairness standards in criminal appeal, filling a gap in this less researched area of studies. Based on a fair trial immediacy requirement, the Court has found several violations of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights at the appellate level by at least eighteen States of the Council of Europe in a vast array of cases, particularly in contexts of first instance acquittals overturning and of sentences increasing on appeal. On the one hand, the book critically engages this case-law with the law revisions it has recently inspired in European countries, as well as with the critiques and difficulties that it continues to raise. On the other hand, it interweaves insight from criminal procedure theory with new discoveries in the field of cognitive sciences (neuroscience of memory, philosophy of knowledge, AI), shedding an interdisciplinary light on the (in)adequacy and limits of the Strasbourg Court's jurisprudence.