Name: To Take Care of Them: An Ethical Case Study of the Canal Incident (en Inglés)
Price: 21.74 USD
Availability: InStock
Author: U. S. Army Command and General Staff Col
ISBN: 9781503101012

portada To Take Care of Them: An Ethical Case Study of the Canal Incident (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

U. S. Army Command and General Staff Col

Editorial

Createspace Independent Publishing Platform

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

130

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

28.0 x 21.6 x 0.7 cm

Peso

0.32 kg.

ISBN13

9781503101012

Categorías

Irak (iraq)
Primera mitad de siglo xxi (c. 2000-c. 2050)
Conflictos tras iigm

To Take Care of Them: An Ethical Case Study of the Canal Incident (en Inglés)

U. S. Army Command and General Staff Col (Autor) · Createspace Independent Publishing Platform · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo

$ 21.74

$ 43.49

Ahorras: $ 21.74

50% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Lunes 22 de Julio y el Lunes 05 de Agosto.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Ecuador entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "To Take Care of Them: An Ethical Case Study of the Canal Incident (en Inglés)"

This book examines the moral permissibility of First Sergeant Hatley's decision to kill, and influence others to kill, four unarmed detainees near Baghdad Iraq in the spring of 2007. Ethics is an important topic for all members of the profession of arms to engage. With the seemingly constant news reports of ethical indiscretions by US Army Soldiers, many of them by senior US Army leaders, the need for continued PME dialogue within the ranks has become exceedingly clear. This Book will strive to do more than simply understand what took place next to that Baghdad canal; it will evaluate and analyze the killings. The questions the will attempt to be answered are, did First Sergeant Hatley possess an inherent right to defend himself against threats of deadly force? Because insurgent activity was so deadly, and because of significant planning deficiencies at the strategic level of war that created ambiguity at the tactical level, was taking care of the detainees his only option for survival? Could the detainees have been considered, by their very existence and presence in the AO regardless of their current posture at the time, imminent threats? Was he morally justified in acting preemptively?